Altcoin Market Cap Sheds $209B, Worse Than FTX Collapse — DOOD Surges 178% as ETH Foundation Stakes Record Sum

The crypto market is flashing distress signals not seen since the darkest days of 2022. With altcoin market capitalization hemorrhaging $209 billion in just 13 months and the Fear & Greed Index pinned at extreme fear for 46 consecutive days, investors face a landscape that is, by several key metrics, worse than the FTX collapse. Yet amid the wreckage, pockets of explosive momentum — like Doodles' 178% surge — reveal a market torn between capitulation and speculative hunger.

Altcoin Market Cap Loses $209 Billion — What Is Happening Right Now?

Quick Answer: The total altcoin market cap has plunged from $1.19 trillion to $719 billion over 13 months — a 39.5% drawdown that has pushed 38% of all altcoins near all-time lows, exceeding the 30% figure during the FTX collapse. BTC dominance at 56.1% and a Fear & Greed reading of 8/100 confirm capital is fleeing to perceived safety.

The altcoin market is experiencing a capitulation event that surpasses the severity of the FTX-era meltdown by multiple measures. Total altcoin market capitalization has contracted from $1.19 trillion in October 2025 to approximately $719 billion as of March 30, 2026 — a $209 billion evaporation representing a 39.5% decline, according to Spoted Crypto research. Roughly 38% of all altcoins are now trading near their all-time lows, compared to approximately 30% during the FTX bankruptcy in November 2022. Bitcoin dominance has climbed to 56.1%, a stark contrast to the 40% level seen during the FTX crisis, signaling that capital is rotating aggressively out of smaller assets and into BTC as a relative safe haven.

The Crypto Fear & Greed Index sits at 8 out of 100, marking 46 consecutive days of extreme fear — the longest such streak since the FTX implosion. To put this in perspective, the index hit an all-time low of 5 on February 6, 2026, falling below the readings recorded during the Terra/Luna crash (6), the COVID crash (8), and the FTX collapse (10), according to Yahoo Finance.

Liquidation data underscores the ongoing pain. In the past 24 hours alone, approximately $155.2 million in positions were liquidated across major exchanges, with long positions accounting for 66.4% — or $65.26 million — of the total, according to MEXC data. A total of 60,849 accounts were wiped out, indicating that leveraged longs continue to be squeezed as the market grinds lower. Binance funding rates remain tepid, with BTC at 0.0005% and ETH at 0.0012%, suggesting limited conviction from either bulls or bears in the derivatives market.

Marcus Thielen, Head of Research at 10x Research, told Spoted Crypto: "Negative premiums in Asia aren't just a sentiment signal — they're a structural symptom of regulatory fragmentation. When you combine BTC dominance at 56.8% with extreme fear readings, capital naturally flows toward the deepest, least-restricted liquidity pools, which are predominantly offshore."

History offers a cautionary but ultimately constructive lens. During previous extreme fear episodes — the March 2020 COVID crash (index at 8, BTC at $4,900), the Terra/Luna implosion in June 2022 (index at 6, BTC at $17,600), and the FTX bankruptcy in November 2022 (index at 10, BTC at $15,500) — six-month forward returns ranged from -4.5% to +133%. Critically, buying when the index was below 25 has historically yielded a 30-day average return of +18%, versus just +2.3% when buying above 75. Large whale wallets appear to be reading the same playbook: net accumulation over the past 30 days has reached +270,000 BTC — the largest monthly haul since 2013, per on-chain tracking data. For a deeper look at what these fear indicators mean for your portfolio, see our full Fear & Greed analysis.

Doodles (DOOD) Surges 178% After Major Exchange Listing — Why Did It Rally Alone in a Fear-Driven Market?

Doodles (DOOD) defied the broader market bloodbath with a staggering 178% price surge following its listing on a major Korean exchange with both KRW and USDT trading pairs — pushing the token to a new all-time high on March 30, 2026, according to Tekedia. Social media engagement on X (formerly Twitter) exploded by 395%, and DOOD quickly climbed into the exchange's top-three assets by 24-hour trading volume. The move was particularly notable given the extreme fear environment, with the broader altcoin market cap sitting at multi-year lows and the Fear & Greed Index at just 8/100.

The rally highlights a recurring pattern in bear markets: new exchange listings act as short-term liquidity magnets, channeling idle capital from sidelined retail traders into fresh assets. In a market where 38% of altcoins are near all-time lows, a newly listed token with a recognizable NFT brand and zero downtrend baggage becomes a powerful psychological draw. Regional retail flows — particularly from Asian markets where exchange-specific listings carry outsized influence — amplified the move despite negative regional premiums of approximately -2.15% on Bitcoin, which typically signals reduced local buying appetite.

However, history suggests caution. Exchange-listing pumps in fear-driven markets tend to be sharp but short-lived. The initial surge is often driven by market makers seeding liquidity and early speculators front-running retail volume, rather than by sustained organic demand. With overall market altcoin capitulation still in progress and 24-hour liquidations running at $155.2 million, any token rallying in isolation faces significant gravity once the listing hype fades.

The DOOD phenomenon is less about Doodles' fundamentals and more about what it reveals: a market starved for upside narratives. When a single listing can generate 178% returns in 24 hours while the rest of the market bleeds, it signals extreme liquidity fragmentation — capital isn't flowing broadly, it's chasing the narrowest possible momentum trades. For traders evaluating new listing opportunities, the key question isn't whether the next DOOD will appear, but whether they can exit before the inevitable mean reversion. Funding rates on Binance remain near neutral across majors (BTC at 0.0005%, ETH at 0.0012%), confirming that derivatives markets aren't buying into broader bullish momentum just yet.

Ethereum Foundation Stakes Record $46.2M — Why Double Down in a Bear Market?

The Ethereum Foundation just made its largest single staking deposit in history — 22,517 ETH worth approximately $46.2 million — at a time when the broader crypto market is drowning in fear. This record-breaking move, executed through Bitwise's institutional staking infrastructure, forms part of a broader plan to stake 70,000 ETH from the Foundation's treasury. With the Fear & Greed Index pinned at 8/100 for 46 consecutive days, this deliberate capital deployment sends an unmistakable signal: the organization closest to Ethereum's protocol development is betting heavily on the network's long-term yield generation, even as annual staking returns have compressed from 3.4% at the start of the year to just 2.7% today. The Foundation still holds 147,400 ETH valued at roughly $303 million, giving it substantial runway for future deployments.

Breaking Down the Staking Strategy

Why would the Ethereum Foundation lock up tens of millions at a diminished yield? The answer lies in opportunity cost calculus. Holding idle ETH in a treasury generates zero income. Even at a compressed 2.7% annual return, staking 22,517 ETH produces roughly $1.25 million per year in passive revenue — capital that can fund protocol research, developer grants, and ecosystem growth without liquidating core holdings. The choice of Bitwise as the staking infrastructure partner is equally telling: it signals institutional-grade risk management, with distributed validator technology reducing slashing risk and maximizing uptime.

The timing also carries strategic weight. With ETH trading at $2,059 (+3.16% in 24 hours according to Binance data), the Foundation is effectively dollar-cost averaging its staking deployment during what many analysts consider a cyclical bottom. Historically, entities that deployed capital during extreme fear phases — like the current 46-day streak — captured outsized returns when sentiment reversed. If ETH follows the pattern set after previous capitulation events, the Foundation's staked position could appreciate significantly while simultaneously generating yield.

Ethereum Foundation Staking Timeline & Treasury Status

The broader implication for investors is hard to ignore. When the entity with the deepest insight into Ethereum's development roadmap — including upcoming protocol upgrades and scaling milestones — chooses to lock capital into multi-year staking commitments during peak fear, it functions as a powerful form of insider conviction signaling. For those tracking altcoin capitulation metrics, the Foundation's aggressive staking posture contrasts sharply with the 38% of altcoins trading near all-time lows, suggesting a significant divergence between institutional positioning and retail sentiment.

TRON USDT Hits $85.3B, Surpasses Ethereum — What the Stablecoin Power Shift Means

TRON now hosts more USDT than any other blockchain, with its on-chain stablecoin market capitalization reaching $85.3 billion and processing over 75% of all global USDT transactions. This milestone, first reported by FXStreet, represents a structural reversal in the stablecoin landscape that has been years in the making. While Ethereum pioneered the DeFi economy and remains the settlement layer for complex financial products, TRON has quietly captured the high-frequency, low-value transfer market — the everyday payments, remittances, and peer-to-peer transactions that constitute the bulk of stablecoin utility. In a market where BTC dominance has climbed to 56.1% and risk appetite has evaporated, the flow of capital into TRON-based stablecoins reveals where real-world demand is concentrating.

Why TRON Dominates the Stablecoin Highway

The structural advantages are straightforward. TRON transactions settle in approximately 3 seconds with fees often below $1, compared to Ethereum's variable gas costs that can spike to $5–$20 during network congestion. For a merchant in Southeast Asia processing $50 cross-border payments or a freelancer in Latin America receiving $200 in wages, the difference between a $0.50 fee and a $12 fee is the difference between viability and impracticality. This cost asymmetry has created a self-reinforcing flywheel: more users attract more liquidity providers, which deepens order books, which attracts more users.

The data tells a compelling story about where crypto finds real utility beyond speculation. Even as the total crypto market cap has contracted to $2.41 trillion and the Fear & Greed Index sits at an extreme-fear reading of 8/100, stablecoin volumes on TRON have remained resilient. This divergence highlights a critical insight: stablecoins are increasingly decoupled from the speculative cycle that governs tokens like BTC and ETH. They function as financial infrastructure rather than investment vehicles.

Stablecoin & Infrastructure Protocol Performance Snapshot

The Hyperliquid Paradox: Infrastructure Thrives While Markets Bleed

Perhaps the most counterintuitive data point in this bear market is Hyperliquid's weekly fee revenue surging 56% to $14 million — an annualized run rate exceeding $600 million. While token prices crater and retail investors flee, the decentralized perpetuals exchange is generating more revenue than ever. The explanation is paradoxically simple: volatility is the product, not the enemy. With $155.2 million in 24-hour liquidations (66.4% from long positions), traders are actively using derivative platforms to hedge, speculate on downside, or manage risk — all of which generate fees for the protocol.

This convergence of TRON's stablecoin dominance and Hyperliquid's fee explosion illustrates a maturing market architecture. Real utility — whether moving dollars across borders or providing leveraged trading infrastructure — continues to generate value independent of token price action. For investors evaluating where to allocate during a period of extreme fear, the revenue-generating infrastructure layer may offer more defensible fundamentals than speculative token bets in an environment where 38% of altcoins are trading near all-time lows.

How Has the Market Moved After Historically Extreme Fear Zones? — A Data-Driven Review

Extreme fear in crypto markets has historically served as one of the most reliable contrarian buy signals — but not without exceptions that punished premature optimism. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index, which aggregates volatility, volume, social sentiment, and dominance data, has dipped below 10 only four times since its inception. According to Yahoo Finance, the index hit an all-time low of 5 on February 6, 2026 — lower than the COVID crash (8), the FTX collapse (10), and even the Terra/Luna contagion (6). The current reading of 8/100, sustained for 46 consecutive days per Spoted Crypto, marks the longest unbroken streak of extreme fear since the FTX implosion in November 2022. This prolonged capitulation raises a critical question: does history favor those who buy into panic, or does the current cycle carry unique risks that invalidate past playbooks?

Historical Extreme Fear Episodes vs. Forward Returns

The data paints a nuanced picture. During the COVID crash of March 2020, the index plunged to 8 as BTC collapsed to $4,900. Within six months, Bitcoin had surged +133%, rewarding buyers who stepped in during peak panic. The FTX collapse of November 2022 followed a similar trajectory: with the index at 10 and BTC at $15,500, the subsequent six-month return reached +96%. However, the Terra/Luna contagion of June 2022 delivered a cautionary tale — despite the index registering an extreme 6 with BTC at $17,600, the market declined an additional -4.5% over six months as second-wave contagion from Three Arrows Capital and Celsius cascaded through the ecosystem.

The Statistical Edge of Buying Fear

Aggregated backtesting data reveals a compelling asymmetry. Historically, purchasing Bitcoin when the Fear & Greed Index drops below 25 has delivered a 30-day average return of +18%, according to Spoted Crypto research. By contrast, buying when the index exceeds 75 — the euphoria zone — yields a mere +2.3% over the same timeframe. Historical post-capitulation rallies have ranged from 150% to 1,400%, suggesting asymmetric upside potential for those willing to endure short-term drawdowns.

Rony Szuster, Head of Research at Mercado Bitcoin, reinforced this perspective: "Buying during periods of fear has been more effective than buying during euphoria." Yet the critical caveat remains the Terra/Luna precedent: extreme fear does not guarantee a V-shaped recovery if systemic contagion is still unfolding. With 38% of altcoins near all-time lows — exceeding the 30% recorded during the FTX collapse, per Spoted Crypto analysis — investors must distinguish between panic-driven discounts and fundamentally impaired assets before deploying capital. For a full breakdown of the altcoin devastation compared to previous cycles, see our altcoin capitulation analysis.

Whales Are Buying While Retail Sells — On-Chain Smart Money Flow Analysis

One of the most pronounced divergences in crypto market history is unfolding in real time: institutional capital and large-wallet holders are aggressively accumulating Bitcoin while retail investors liquidate positions at an accelerating rate. Over the past 30 days, BTC whales — wallets holding 1,000+ BTC — have accumulated a net +270,000 BTC, the largest 30-day accumulation event since 2013, according to Spoted Crypto data. Simultaneously, Q1 2026 BTC ETF inflows reached $18.7 billion, confirming that institutional allocators are treating the current extreme fear environment as a strategic entry window rather than a reason to exit. This behavioral split between smart money and retail carries historically significant implications for price direction.

Institutional Accumulation at Scale

The 270,000 BTC whale accumulation dwarfs previous institutional buying waves. For context, the post-FTX whale accumulation in late 2022 totaled roughly 140,000 BTC over a comparable 30-day window — less than half the current rate. The ETF channel reinforces the narrative: $18.7 billion in Q1 inflows means institutional funds continued to pour into Bitcoin spot products even as the Fear & Greed Index sat at single digits for 46 consecutive days. As Alex Thorn, Head of Firmwide Research at Galaxy Digital, noted: "2026 is too chaotic to predict… risk remains to the downside in the near term." Yet Galaxy's own fund flows suggest their trading desks are not standing idle — the gap between institutional caution in public commentary and aggressive accumulation in on-chain data is itself a signal.

Retail Capitulation Signals Across Global Markets

On the opposite side of the trade, retail sentiment indicators flash deep capitulation. Regional exchange premiums — one of the clearest proxies for local retail conviction — have turned negative across multiple Asian markets. The Kimchi premium, which tracks the BTC price spread between Korean exchanges and global benchmarks, has declined to -2.15%, indicating that Korean retail investors are selling at a discount relative to global spot prices. This is particularly notable because South Korea has historically been among the most bullish retail markets during crypto upswings. Clara Wu, Head of Research at Kaiko, explained the significance: "Regional premiums are a real-time referendum on local retail conviction. When you see sustained negative premiums in historically bullish markets like Korea and India, it tells you the retail capitulation cycle hasn't bottomed yet."

Historically, this type of whale-retail divergence has resolved in favor of institutional positioning. During Q4 2022, whale wallets accumulated heavily at $15,000–$17,000 BTC while retail exchange deposits spiked — Bitcoin subsequently rallied 96% over the next six months. The current divergence is structurally similar but larger in magnitude. For investors tracking on-chain flows, the message from smart money is unambiguous: accumulate into fear. Whether that thesis holds depends on whether the altcoin market's structural damage remains contained or triggers broader contagion — a risk that even the most aggressive whales cannot fully hedge.

April Key Events and Altcoin Market Outlook — Critical Watchpoints for Investors

Quick Answer: April opens with the SUI token unlock releasing 42.9 million tokens (~$40 million) on April 1, adding near-term sell pressure to an already fragile altcoin market where 38% of tokens sit near all-time lows. Historical data shows extreme-fear rebounds ranging 150%–1,400%, but a secondary leg down remains a live risk — making dry-powder positioning and staged entries the consensus strategy among institutional analysts.

April 2026 arrives at a critical inflection point for the altcoin market, with the Fear & Greed Index stuck at 8/100 for 46 consecutive days — the longest extreme-fear streak since the FTX collapse in November 2022, according to Spoted Crypto data. The month's first catalyst lands immediately: the SUI network is set to unlock 42.9 million tokens on April 1, representing 1.1% of circulating supply and roughly $40 million in potential sell-side liquidity, per ainvest. While percentage dilution appears modest, the timing amplifies risk: with total altcoin market capitalization already hemorrhaging $209 billion since October 2025 — falling from $1.19 trillion to $719 billion — even marginal supply shocks can cascade through thin order books. Investors face a month where macro catalysts, token unlocks, and sentiment extremes converge to create both outsized opportunity and outsized danger.

Historical Extreme-Fear Rebounds: What the Data Actually Shows

The temptation to buy during peak capitulation is supported by compelling historical evidence — but the data also demands nuance. When the Fear & Greed Index dropped to 8 during the March 2020 COVID crash, Bitcoin was trading at $4,900 and delivered +133% over the following six months. The FTX collapse in November 2022 saw the index hit 10 with BTC at $15,500, followed by a +96% recovery within six months. Across multiple extreme-fear episodes, post-capitulation rallies have ranged from 150% to 1,400%, and purchases made when the index reads below 25 have historically returned an average of +18% within 30 days — compared to just +2.3% when buying above 75, according to Spoted Crypto analysis.

However, one critical outlier deserves attention. The Terra/Luna implosion in June 2022 pushed the index to 6 with BTC at $17,600 — yet six months later, Bitcoin was actually down 4.5% following a secondary collapse triggered by FTX. This precedent matters: not every capitulation event marks a definitive bottom. In the current cycle, with 38% of altcoins trading near all-time lows versus roughly 30% during the FTX era, the breadth of damage is structurally worse than any prior drawdown.

Expert Outlook: Managing Risk in an Unpredictable Environment

Alex Thorn, Head of Firmwide Research at Galaxy Digital, summarized the institutional consensus plainly: "2026 is too chaotic to predict… risk remains to the downside in the near term," as reported by Spoted Crypto. This assessment aligns with current derivatives data: BTC funding rates on Binance sit at a tepid 0.0005%, while 24-hour liquidations totaled $155.2 million with longs accounting for 66.4%, according to MEXC — confirming that leveraged optimists are still being flushed out of the market.

Two tactical frameworks dominate institutional discussion. The dry-powder strategy — holding stablecoin reserves and waiting for confirmed trend reversal — is favored by risk-averse participants. Bryan Tan of Wintermute has explicitly advised that investors are "better off holding dry powder while prices swing wildly on headlines." The alternative, a staged dollar-cost-averaging (DCA) approach, deploys capital in fixed increments across predefined price levels, capturing potential bottoms without requiring precise timing. For readers tracking the broader altcoin capitulation thesis, the distinction between recoverable and endangered sectors is crucial: infrastructure tokens with revenue (e.g., Hyperliquid generating $14 million in weekly fees per CoinMarketCap) and ecosystems backed by institutional staking (Ethereum Foundation's 70,000 ETH commitment) carry fundamentally different risk profiles than speculative tokens with no cash flow. In a market where BTC dominance holds at 56.1% and whale wallets have accumulated 270,000 BTC over 30 days — the largest accumulation since 2013 — selectivity is not optional; it is survival.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is altcoin capitulation and are we in one right now?

Altcoin capitulation is a market phase in which investors collectively abandon their positions at steep losses, typically triggered by prolonged fear and sustained downward price action. It is characterized by accelerating sell-offs, extreme fear sentiment, and a large percentage of tokens trading near or below their all-time lows. Capitulation marks the point where even committed holders lose conviction — and historically, it has preceded some of the sharpest recoveries in crypto market history.

By every measurable metric, the current market meets the definition of a full-blown capitulation event. The total altcoin market cap has shed $209 billion over 13 months — falling from $1.19 trillion in October 2025 to just $719 billion as of March 2026, according to Spoted Crypto research. Approximately 38% of all altcoins are now trading near their all-time lows, a figure that surpasses even the FTX collapse in November 2022, when roughly 30% of altcoins hit similar distress levels. Meanwhile, the Crypto Fear & Greed Index has remained in "Extreme Fear" territory for 46 consecutive days — the longest streak since the FTX implosion — with a current reading of just 8 out of 100. As Clara Wu, Head of Research at Kaiko, noted: "When you see sustained negative premiums in historically bullish markets like Korea and India, it tells you the retail capitulation cycle hasn't bottomed yet."

Does buying when the Fear & Greed Index hits Extreme Fear actually generate returns?

Historical data suggests that purchasing crypto assets during periods of extreme fear has significantly outperformed buying during euphoria — but the strategy is far from risk-free. According to aggregated backtesting data, buying when the Fear & Greed Index falls below 25 has produced an average 30-day return of +18%, compared to just +2.3% when buying above 75, as reported by Spoted Crypto.

Three major precedents illustrate both the opportunity and the risk. During the COVID crash of March 2020 (index reading: 8), Bitcoin bottomed near $4,900 and surged +133% within six months. After the FTX collapse in November 2022 (index reading: 10), BTC climbed from $15,500 to deliver a +96% gain over the following half-year. However, the Terra/Luna meltdown in June 2022 (index reading: 6) tells a cautionary tale — Bitcoin drifted to a −4.5% return over six months as a secondary crash dragged prices lower before any meaningful recovery materialized. Rony Szuster, Head of Research at Mercado Bitcoin, summarized it well: "Buying during periods of fear has been more effective than buying during euphoria." Yet Bryan Tan, Analyst at Wintermute, cautioned that "investors are better off holding dry powder while prices swing wildly on headlines." The current 46-day extreme fear streak — with the index hitting an all-time low of 5 on February 6, 2026, per Yahoo Finance — is deeper than any of those three episodes, making direct comparison inherently uncertain.

Why did DOOD (Doodles) surge and is it safe to buy now?

DOOD (Doodles) exploded 178% in a single session after being listed on a major Korean exchange with KRW and USDT trading pairs, briefly reaching a new all-time high while social media mentions on X surged 395%, as reported by Tekedia. The move is a textbook example of the "new listing effect" — a phenomenon where freshly listed tokens absorb concentrated speculative demand in a short window, particularly when broader market sentiment is deeply depressed and traders hunt for isolated momentum plays.

History offers a clear pattern for newly listed tokens that spike during fear-driven markets: initial parabolic moves of 100–300% are frequently followed by sharp corrections of 40–60% within the first two weeks as early buyers take profit and listing-driven hype fades. During the current capitulation environment — with 38% of altcoins near all-time lows — such outlier rallies tend to be liquidity-driven rather than fundamentally supported. With 24-hour liquidations reaching $155 million and long positions comprising 66.4% of those wipeouts according to MEXC data, leveraged speculation around newly listed tokens carries amplified risk. Any investment decision regarding DOOD should account for the extreme volatility environment and is ultimately an individual responsibility based on personal risk tolerance and due diligence.

Why is the Ethereum Foundation staking a large amount of ETH?

The Ethereum Foundation executed its largest-ever single staking deposit of 22,517 ETH (approximately $46.2 million) on March 30, 2026, utilizing Bitwise infrastructure to participate in network validation, as confirmed by CoinDesk. This transaction is part of a broader plan to stake a total of 70,000 ETH, representing a strategic shift toward generating sustainable yield to fund the Foundation's ongoing development, research, and ecosystem grants.

The primary motivation is financial sustainability. At the current staking yield of roughly 2.7% annually, the full 70,000 ETH deployment would generate meaningful recurring revenue without requiring the Foundation to sell its ETH holdings — a practice that has historically drawn criticism from the community and created selling pressure on the asset. Beyond balance-sheet management, the move carries significant signaling weight: it represents one of the strongest long-term conviction signals from Ethereum's steward organization, demonstrating that the Foundation views ETH as a productive, hold-worthy asset rather than a treasury item to be liquidated. Additionally, the staked ETH strengthens network security by increasing the total validator stake, making Ethereum's proof-of-stake consensus more economically resilient against potential attacks — a particularly meaningful contribution during a market environment where Alex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Digital, warns that "risk remains to the downside in the near term."

Data Sources

• Spoted Crypto — Fear & Greed Index: 46-Day Extreme Fear Analysis
• Spoted Crypto — Altcoin Capitulation: Worse Than FTX
• CoinDesk — Ethereum Foundation Stakes Additional $42M of Ether
• Yahoo Finance — Crypto Fear & Greed Index Hits All-Time Low of 5
• Tekedia — DOOD (Doodles) 178% Surge on Exchange Listing
• MEXC — 24-Hour Liquidation Data ($155M Total)
• CoinMarketCap — Hyperliquid Weekly Fee Revenue Data
• FXStreet — TRON USDT Market Cap Surpasses Ethereum

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment decisions should be made based on your own judgment and responsibility.

Related Articles

• Altcoin Capitulation Worse Than FTX: $209B Wiped in 13 Months — Where's the Bottom?
• Altcoin Bloodbath: $209B Wiped Out, 38% Near All-Time Lows — Capitulation Worse Than FTX Collapse
• Kimchi Premium Turns Negative: What the Reverse Premium Signals for Crypto Markets
• Backpack BP Token TGE Breakdown: 0% Insider Allocation and 25% Airdrop Experiment
• SEC & CFTC Classify 16 Digital Commodities: What It Means for Altcoins